BOSTON — With more frequent and intense storms battering Massachusetts’ shores, the state’s Department of Environmental Protection released new draft regulations on Friday to “protect both communities and infrastructure from the impacts of climate change.”
The proposed regulations are intended to help protect areas vulnerable to sea-level rise and storm surge. Among other changes, the rules would restrict development in the most vulnerable areas of the coastal floodplain and promote nature-based solutions to flooding.
“The extreme weather that we’re seeing across the commonwealth, across the nation, across the globe, in some instances, is another reminder that climate change is here in Massachusetts, and that we are particularly vulnerable to both inland and coastal flooding,” MassDEP Commissioner Bonnie Heiple said.
MassDEP workers have been working on these regulatory updates for a few years, referring to them as “Resilience 1.0 draft regulations,” which will make changes to the Wetlands Protection Act and waterways regulations. Additional changes to the Wetlands Protection Act will be coming in the “not too distant future,” she said.
More than 20 inches of rain fell in Boston during the summer of 2023, the second highest total on record, according to the National Weather Service. Floods devastated farmland in the western part of the state and coastal cities and towns experienced water running through their streets a handful of times throughout the summer.
“We’ve seen infrastructure fail. We’ve seen significant damage to homes and businesses, including farms, and we’re seeing the economic ramifications of that as well,” Heiple said.
The proposed wetlands regulations would create “performance standards,” or requirements, for homeowners and developers to protect the natural buffering function of wetlands and floodplains.
This includes requiring that new development in areas of the coastal floodplain, where most storm damage occurs, be elevated. The regulations also seek to minimize new development altogether in the most vulnerable areas of the coast, typically small areas of land directly on the shore.
“In that outermost zone where wave action tends to be over three feet tall, there would be no new development permitted,” Heiple said. “So these houses that are being built in areas that are increasingly perilous to build, the proposal is that that type of development would no longer be allowed, redevelopment would still be allowed subject to certain standards.”
Debate over whether to build new housing directly on the shoreline has raged in coastal communities for years. Many on Cape Cod, where out-of-staters commonly buy ocean-side property to build large second homes, have fought back against this type of development.
Environmental advocates say over-developing the shoreline contributes to coastal erosion and disrupts native species’ habitats, while others argue that the valuable property sales are good for the economy.
Heiple told reporters on Thursday that restricting development in these areas is better for the community and the natural environment, as well as homeowners, who would have to pay to keep up with extensive property damage every year.
The coastal floodplain in Massachusetts hosts nearly $55 billion in structures, of which about $40 billion is residential, $12 billion is industrial and $2.5 billion is commercial, according to MassDEP. Of the nearly 2.5 million people living within Massachusetts’ 78 coastal communities, about 55% are in “environmental justice communities,” which is an area made up primarily of people of color, low-income populations or communities with language barriers.
About 10% of this “most vulnerable” section of the coastal floodplain will be covered by these new development-restricting regulations, Heiple said, as much of this property is already developed or covered by other regulations for beaches or wetlands.
“It’s actually quite a small slice when you see the mapping. It’s little bits and pieces of of the coastline that are still available,” she said. “We think it’s really important that we’re not continuing to build in those areas. But this is, this won’t affect broad swaths of remaining coastline that would be subject to development.”
In addition to restricting development in the most vulnerable areas, the updates encourage nature-based approaches to improve resilience, such as restoration of salt marshes, coastal dunes and barrier beaches on the coast, as well as inland wetlands.
Under the amended regulations, MassDEP would create a new type of credit for “Green Site Design.” These credits could be given to developers who use natural solutions — like trees and buffer zones — to manage stormwater, instead of more expensive detention basins and other traditional infrastructure.
Stormwater runoff picks up fertilizer, oil, pesticides, dirt and other pollutants as it makes its way through storm drains and dumps into freshwater and the ocean without being treated.{/div}{div class=”subscriber-only”}The Green Site Design credits aren’t monetary credits, but are a way of excusing the developer from having to construct infrastructure, stormwater pipes and detention basins if they use natural resources instead.{/div}{div class=”subscriber-only”}“It’s a credit in terms of how much stormwater you’re managing. So if you put in a certain number of trees or you have a swale, the Conservation Commission will be able to say something like, ‘Oh, we see that you get credit for 25 or 50% of the stormwater that you would have managed,’” said Kathleen Baskin, assistant commissioner at MassDEP’s Bureau of Water Resources.{/div}{div class=”subscriber-only”}“The development community is excited about this too, because it’s actually less costly to put in these natural solutions,” Baskin said.{/div}{div class=”subscriber-only”}MassDEP officials said they worked with other state agencies, environmental groups, scientists and members of the development community such as the Home Builders and Remodelers Association over several years to draft these regulatory re-writes.{div class=”tnt-ads-container text-center”}The wetlands amendments also use up-to-date data to create the new standards — replacing the 1961 data that is currently used.{/div}{/div}{div class=”subscriber-only”}Using outdated data to design stormwater systems means pipes can be too small to carry increased volumes of water, resulting in overflows and flooding, according to MassDEP.{/div}{div class=”subscriber-only”}“Right now we’re using data from 1961, which somebody said recently is older than the moon landing,” Baskin said. “So it’s time for us to update and get ready for the extreme events of today.”{/div}{div class=”subscriber-only”}The new regulations are based on data from 2019, the most recently available information from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.{/div}{div class=”subscriber-only”}The Metropolitan Area Planning Council is currently seeking more information about stormwater flooding in grater Boston. Their report released earlier this year, “Water, Water Everywhere: The Increasing Threat of Stormwater Flooding in Greater Boston” called for greater transparency over stormwater flooding locations across the region.{/div}{div class=”subscriber-only”}“The dangers of lack of this information were made unfortunately apparent this past Monday, when heavy rains and winds caused extreme flooding, damage, and power outages throughout New England,” says a release from MAPC, encouraging municipal officials, community organizations, residents, and businesses in the region to complete their survey to assess flooding damage.{/div}{div class=”subscriber-only”}Baskin said Thursday that the new regulations are designed to be flexible for homeowners and families. Single-family houses and housing development with four or fewer units are exempted from the stormwater requirements and wetlands regulations, and new housing developments with five to nine units per lot must meet the new standards “only to the extent possible.”{div class=”tnt-ads-container text-center”} “If it’s a larger development, 10 housing units or more, we feel that those would be having more of an impact and should be brought in under our stormwater management standards,” she said.{/div}{/div}{div class=”subscriber-only”}Asked how many developments would be exempt to the new standard under this provision, Heiple replied that smaller units wouldn’t be required to create natural stormwater barriers but are still eligible for the same assistance and credit programs if they choose to pursue this type of stormwater management on their property.{/div}{div class=”subscriber-only”}“It’s not as if people who previously had to have a whole stormwater management system designed are no longer required to do that,” she said.
“I think we are just trying to be thoughtful, I think Kathy put it correctly before, these larger developments are really those with more impervious surface, more pavement and things that cause stormwater to be conveyed off site. Those are the types of developments that really require this updated thinking.”{/div}{div class=”subscriber-only”}MassDEP is holding a public comment period on the draft regulations for 70 days, due March 1. MassDEP will hold three virtual public information sessions, two on Jan. 18 and one on Jan. 23. Public hearings will be held over Zoom on Jan. 31 and Feb. 1.{/div}{div class=”tnt-ads-container text-center”} {/div}{/div}