ST. PAUL — A federal judge dismissed a case filed by former Republican candidate for Minnesota governor Scott Jensen, who alleged that state investigations of his claims regarding COVID-19 were “politically motivated.”
The court granted the medical board’s motion to dismiss Jensen’s federal lawsuit without prejudice on March 31, based on lack of standing. This is the second time the court granted the medical board’s motion to dismiss this case without prejudice, meaning Jensen can file the charges again.
Jensen, a Minnesota family practice physician who unsuccessfully ran for governor against Democrat Tim Walz in 2022, filed the federal lawsuit in June 2023, claiming the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice violated his First Amendment rights to free speech and abused its power when investigating his claims regarding COVID-19.
His lawsuit claims his views, which contradicted those in mainstream media, were “both critical and complimentary” of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s actions.
In March 2024, the court first dismissed the case, claiming Jensen failed to sufficiently allege a concrete injury.
The first order to dismiss said Jensen’s claims that he was politically targeted and that the anonymous complaints had an “ongoing chilling and suppressing effect” did not establish standing for his argument. Jensen also claimed the board treated physicians with different views “more favorably,” but according to the court order, Jensen did not establish “standing for his viewpoint discrimination and equal protection claims.”
Jensen filed an amended complaint less than three weeks later; however, the court claimed this year that Jensen again failed to allege a concrete injury.
“Emotional distress alone is not a cognizable injury in fact that creates standing,” the court order dismissing the lawsuit said.
In a release to the Upper Midwest Law Center, Jensen said his lawsuit has never been about one person.
“It’s about all of us and our right to free speech,” he said in the release. “If it can happen to me, why couldn’t it happen to anyone?”
The UMLC responded to the court’s dismissal of Jensen’s lawsuit, noting that the center disagrees.
“Dr. Jensen will appeal, and he will win,” UMLC Senior Counsel James Dickey said in a release.
Dickey noted that Jensen had never been investigated by the medical board in his 40 years of medical practice and that Jensen was selected to be the 2016 Minnesota Family Practice Doctor of the Year.
“Suddenly, because he was willing to speak out and subsequently chose to run for governor, he was investigated by his licensing board — appointed by his opponent — five times,” Dickey said. “Anyone in his shoes would think twice about talking after that experience. He was obviously harmed by these frivolous speech investigations. The First Amendment stands in the way of that kind of weaponized government censorship.”